The war at this point (at least the "Ukraine-phase" of it) is half-over. Once another 5 or so former Ukrainian Oblasts are officially annexed, the focus may shift (rightly so) to Demilitarizing and Denazifying the Baltics.
A reminder: The Trade Union Building Fire and the general lynchings, murders, rapes, etc of Russian nationals and speakers ... that was used by President Putin as a Casus Belli (One among many) to justify "De-Nazification" in Ukraine.
The Baltics are at this point, already engaged in these forms of monstrosities. All that's left is a mass murder and/or slaughter of their Russian minority. At that point, the missiles will fly and the tanks will begin to roll in to level the place.
Unlike Ukraine (inspite of its turn to Nazi ideology) which is viewed by Russians as a "brotherly" nation; the Baltics are viewed (correctly so) as Nazis + Nazi collaborators (historically, and also at present given all the mercenary groups emanating from them).
Riga, Talinn and Vilnius will become smoking heaps of rubble filled with wails of misery and an "all against all" mentality on the ground. That future runs towards us in earnest!
If that fails, then run away and declare unconditional peace.
It is extremely difficult to kill Putin. Therefore, the war will peter out.
Just another winter of low-level angst and corruption in Europe, as any other winter.
The Retarded States of Europe would be a name to consider in the future decades.
If the soccer players all die in Qatar and never come back, then maybe Europe could be saved culturally. But there will only be war in the newspaapers and in the very damaged minds of the people addicted to FUD.
I have read that Putin might escalate it from a Special Military Operation(SMO,) to a Counterterrorism Operation(CTO). From what I have read, Putin is using specific terms short of war in accordance with established international law, including the UN Charter, as well as Russian law.
Unlike the US, Putin follows all the requirements of the law when he authorizes military action. This is very helpful with the rest of the world outside the American hegemony. This is a battle of state sovereignty vs. globalism. Putin, even when invading, is respecting state sovereignty principles.
I hadn't read that but it sounds plausible to me. I agree that the Russians (and Chinese) actively attempt to follow the letter of the law more than the US. The US tends to see itself as embodying "the spirit of the law" and thus being above the written words. The Russians deem us "incapable of agreement" as a result. (They have a specific Russian word or phrase which escapes me, I apologize.)
In any case, I think one could make the case that if the eastern provinces join the Russian Federation, and are then attacked, then Russia would be within its rights to wage war under the color of law. The US and EU would dispute it, of course, but they'll dispute a CTO as well.
Under the "rules based international order" aka American empire, America has broken international law repeatedly and justified it. The "rules" are just whatever America decides at any given time and can be contradictory. This is how a hegemon acts, so no surprise.
But America doesn't act under the "spirit of the law". All of Russia's friends know this and want to end the American order. America is actually really bad at being a hegemon, as we have too many greedy midwits in leadership.
America may not act under the "spirit of the law" by any objective criteria, but what I said was that it sees itself as embodying it. And I do think America *definitely* sees itself as embodying it. "We are the indispensable nation" is a direct quote from one of our Presidents. That self-perception is how we justify breaking the rules we claim to uphold. Ok, so, that said, do you actually disagree that is America's self-perception? If so, how do you think America sees itself? Or did you just want to clarify that America isn't what it thinks it is?
American leaders, like the British previously, view whatever they do as good and correct. America traditionally held itself above things like deal making and diplomacy. We could say this started with Wilson, but it was established previously, like with the Open Door policy or even the Monroe Doctrine.
As to breaking laws, that is what America always does. We are just self righteous tyrants that claim to be just abiding by rules but only to enforce them on others, never ourselves. Then we get blowback and wonder how it happened.
America is "indispensable" only because we forced the end of England's and France's empires after WW2 and created Pax Americana. And 30 years ago, instead of allowing the creation of a multipolar world after the end of the Cold War, our leaders decided to rule the world.
American people want to see themselves as selfless good guys. Many politicians want that as well. It isn't true and has not been true. This is the fundamental dilemma for America. Can we admit we act for self interest and to maintain our empire? Or do we keep lying to ourselves about our motives and goals? We push the moralizing about war as a way to justify ourselves.
Tl:dr; version: America leaders lie to it the people and moralize that we are doing something for "good", while breaking laws and rules. The way the FBI treated Trump over the last 6 years is how America treats the world.
I agree with this assessment. I actually had started writing an essay about the American dilemma of trying to maintain itself as "the indispensable nation" while at the same time acting in naked self-interest. But it was too bleak even for me. I might revisit it at some future point.
It was a discussion I had at length with my US foreign relations PhD advisor. I really appreciate some of the older critiques of American foreign policy from what we would term "leftists" at the time, but would struggle to fit into modern leftism.
The antiwar and anti empire idea existed on the Right until the death of Senator Taft in the 50s, only to come back with Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul (though for different reasons). The left had prominent antiwar and anti empire folks from WWI. I find myself in agreement with these people more than I would have thought. My old school far leftist advisor and I agreed on so much, including that Wilson was the devil.
We took up England's role as enforcers for the globalist speculative financial interests. We don't even do our own bidding. Everything else is smokescreen and illusion, to deceive good intentioned people.
""We seem, as it were, to have conquered and peopled half the world in a fit of absence of mind.""
~John Robert Seeley
This mind you is the very same Seeley who played a pivotal role in the 1880s (and beyond) popularizing the "Imperial Federation" model (essentially a superstate comprising the Home Islands and the colonies) rather than pursuing Home Rule (which he correctly noted in his Historiographical works and sketches as ultimately leading to independence for said colonies and a fracturing of the Empire).
If anything, Yankee-land is just the "Imperial Federation... Downsized". At least... functionally it behaves in a manner precisely which would have made Seeley beam with joy.
What we have today is Yankee-land running amok as a rogue nation of pirates, thieves, rapists and murderers in that manner which Seeley observed... "in a fit of absence of mind".
And this is why, no such dilemma ultimately exists for the Yankee... because to get to a dilemma one must Ipso facto be *thinking* to begin with.
However, no such thing is happening here. Yankee land is engaged in an Autopoesis that is entirely sub-rational and in a way "beyond" thinking.
> What we have today is Yankee-land running amok as a rogue nation of pirates, thieves, rapists and murderers
Um, no. Compare America to just about any historical Empire, like say one of your beloved caliphates. Those were much more piratical, thieving, rapy, and murderous than America ever was.
provocative stuff. I will say that the proclamations that 90% of people in contested territories want to be part of Russia sounds frighteningly similar to Hitler's claims about ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland.
also re below; i think the idea that Putin follows the requirements of "the law" (whose? International? Russias?) is absolutely one of the most hysterical things I've ever read.
I recently discovered your Substack and this was an interesting post to read in April 2023. It seems that the surprisingly mild winter in Europe has allowed us to “dodge the bullet” so far on escalation.
Andrei Illarionov - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Illarionov - used to be Putin's senior advisor from 2000 to 2005, but since then became his "critic" (aka enemy.) He is clearly pro-Ukraine in this conflict. However, he had always been very measured in his analysis, though.
He follows Onyx's analysis of the sides' losses. He claims that Onyx is independent and thorough. Here are the two links (the dates are Feb 24, but they are being updated on a regular basis):
In that podcast he makes the following claim. According to their data up until August 21-25 the U to R loss ratio was averaging 1:3.5 or so, with the battle of Severodonetsk and Lysychansk being the highest (for U) ratio of 1:1.1 . His point is that Russia has an advantage in people (including the mobilization potential) and hardware of approximately 5:1, so in the war of attrition any loss ratio less than that is in Russia's favor.
From August 21-25 the ratio went up to 1:7, so now the war of attrition turned against R. That was part of the reason Putin raised the stakes with the mobilization, annexations, and nuclear threats. According to Illarionov Putin wants the US to blinken (sorry, could not resist) and force the U to talk.
Illarionov speculates that the change in loss ratio is connected to U's forces increase in proficiency. They mobilized early and then underwent multi-month training in Europe. Russian army is losing proficiency, on the other hand, due to heavy losses among the professional military.
Some Commentators (such as Gonzalo Lira) have noted that the Nordstream pipelines being sabotaged (we all know by whom; let's not kids ourselves here) are the modern day equivalent of Cortez landing and then burning his ships: essentially signalling to his crew that "there is no turning back". The March to World War (and Yankee-land's Salting) thus draws ever closer.
In our modern day context, the Yankee is whipping his poodles, lackeys, etc in Europe to get ready for a full confrontation with the Russkies. Victoria Nuland did say "Fuck the EU!"; so it looks like she is adamant in following through with that quite *literally*.
The Germans will lose what manufacturing they have left and be among the first to be Bioengineered into Hybrid Chimeras to fight the "Eurasian Hordes" in the near future. Unfortunately for them (and their Yankee overlords) Europe will be overrun very quickly for a very simple reason:
The Qualitative Calibre (not just "escalatory dominance" but at the grand strategic level) of the Russkies has long surpassed both them and their Yankee overlords; who spent most of the money on defunct technologies (the F-35 program, anyone?)
Once the Eurasian Hordes land; the "rulers" will try to flee to their bunkers and mansions in New Zealand and elsewhere (if they have not already); all the while tapping into their final ace in the hole: "Dem White People dun nit!" The Culture Wars of today are just a massive insurance policy to stave off this genocidal outcome for the "ruling elite" of today:
If the Russian Bear, Chinese Dragon, etc start running after you; just push the nearby "HUWYTE people" into their clutches for mauling. Unfortunately for them; neither they (nor the masses they defiled, lampooned and demonized for the last 5+ decades) will be spared.
Anger, Grief and then Revenge... that Trifecta is a bedrock of the human condition. Once it is activated, it will not be satiated until you have a situation like (say) Baghdad overflowing with so much blood, guts, puss, etc that the Euphrates itself goes red-yellow for weeks on end.
For the near future context, the analogue would be the Mississipi going red for a few weeks from all the carnage; especially in the heavier more urban areas being made Yankee-free.
It's a done deal at this point. There is no stopping the street-by-street lynchings, massacres, etc. The only matter is timeframe wise how "fast" will the onset be?
If the self-proclaimed "indispensable nation" is an industrial numb-nut who produces 85 million metric tonnes of steel whilst the Eurasians get well over a billion... it is quite self-evident that this will be a slaughter, not a war.
Ergo, why in every situation the end result is the same: Carthago Delenda Est.
There is no such thing as a "stalemate" in Industrial Warfare.
The Side that outproduces the other Side will Triumph inevitably. In the case of "World War Next", the side outproducing by a factor greater than 10 will Slaughter the other side. It's a Mathematical Certainty, nothing more or less.
Russia is NOT losing this war. The whole thing is staged by all parties to try to bring in the NWO. It should be obvious to everyone by now that all of the countries pretending to be fighting are working together
You're not the first person who has shared this view. Do you care to elaborate? E.g. what is the mechanism by which the war will bring about the NWO, etc?
I believe they will use tactical nukes to take out major cities in all large countries. That, together with their Geoengineered Weather Warfare destroying people, property and food crops, will cause people to panic and beg for help from the UN and the WEF and the WHO and their own governments. I wish people could see through this and rise up together to stop it.
If Nuclear weapons are used, none of these organizations will remain.
There seems be an assumption here that somehow (as the sky darkens from the soot and the vaporized remains and ashes of those people nearest the blast radii) that somehow anything of the "familiar world" we all know to some extent will survive.
The Internet will be completely gone due to EMP weapons destroying critical infrastructure. There will be no "plan" or order here. There can be no "order" or "plan" implemented if the very nature of the world becomes one of "fight or die".
There is no "plan" by the so called "elite class" (Davos-man if you will) that survives this. Schwaub and his ilk will be *lucky* if they are mercifully cannibalized without anesthesia by vagrants and wanderers who have not eaten for 28 days.
No "Elite Plan" will be implemented. Because people will devolve into savages engaged in necrophilia, cannibalism and other monstrosities.
Frankly, to even assume that such a "Plan" to"Save or Damn us all" ... is a sort of optimistic humanist fantasy that falls apart upon closer inspection.
I think you’re right. And they are beginning to realize just what you said here. If the people are unable to get justice their own AI will take them out because they are entitled whiny parasites who contribute nothing to society. THEY are the useless eaters.
Artificial General Intelligence is still quite far away. Thinkers like Bostrom (the author of "Superintelligence" and other related works) note for example that we seem to have reached a "bottleneck" with regard to Replicating Cognition (the standard frameworks taught in the Academia such as Neural Networks, Embodied Cognition, etc just are not getting the job done). In effect, we are (not his words, these are mine:) in an "Uncanny Valley" for the time being. So the "AI" issue is not of importance (at least for now)
If anything, Nuclear War and the fundamental change it would have on society (from the individual bottom up to the larger more cohesive structures such as family, relatives, friends, etc) is of greater concern. I try to explain it using the following analogy:
During the time of Hamilton (i.e. the American founders) to even accuse someone of lying meant being challenged to a life or death duel by said individual who wished to protect his sacred honour. No such notion remains in today's West.
Today, "Kill him" or "Fuck him up" is easily enunciated, threatened (and carried out) with little to no "blowback". Yes, the authorities may or may not intervene, but that too is fading rapidly as the public zeitgeist shifts.
A Nuclear Holocaust of 800 million to 2 billion souls would be a paradigm shift.
The world will be such that "EAT Him" (live, heart beating of course) or "Necrophilize that Sl*t" (already dead and half eaten of course) will become as normal (with regard to enunciation, threats and carrying out) as the aforementioned "Kill him" and "Fuck him up" are found to be today.
It will help your credibility if you learn the difference between a tactical and a strategic nuke. Hint: nukes that are designed to destroy entire cities are not tactical...
And, for what it's worth, there are those in the Christian church who will cite prophecy about what they may view as a "player" in revelation's prophecy. Here's what a Bing search says to the question:
Is Russia Rosh, Gog or Magog?
Gog is a person who rules over the land of Magog (Russia). Magog means the “Prince of Rosh.” (Gog) Rosh is the old root word for the land of Russia. God informs Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38:15 , “You will come from your place in the far North” (the Hebrew word means “the uttermost part of the North.” Hmmm...
I re-read Revelations the other day. There's a plausible case to be made that the First and Second Seals were opened in 2021 and 2022, and that the Third Seal opens this winter...
So, you're telling me that I can relax... that Putin won't plunge the world into a nuclear holocaust, but that we have to wait until Satan's loosed? "And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison," KJV
No. I'm telling you that the invasion predicted in Ezekiel will not happen until Jesus has reigned for a thousand years on earth along with those raised in the First Resurrection -- if Revelations is authoritative.
We can still have bad people do bad things without it fulfilling this particular prophesy. We have had Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Genghis Khan all without the world ending.
We do seem to be entering the Great Falling Away. And the state of Israel exists, which is prophetically significant. But Israel still has no Temple to desecrate in order to fulfill the Olivet Prophecy.
Also, Isaac Newton placed the date as being after 2060.
By then we might have the technology to have an asteroid mining accident/act of terrorism which would fulfill the Wormwood prophecy.
https://www.reuters.com/world/extracts-putins-speech-annexation-ceremony-2022-09-30/
Does Russia officially annex Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia into the Russian Federation? YES
Next Up; Odessa et al.
The war at this point (at least the "Ukraine-phase" of it) is half-over. Once another 5 or so former Ukrainian Oblasts are officially annexed, the focus may shift (rightly so) to Demilitarizing and Denazifying the Baltics.
A reminder: The Trade Union Building Fire and the general lynchings, murders, rapes, etc of Russian nationals and speakers ... that was used by President Putin as a Casus Belli (One among many) to justify "De-Nazification" in Ukraine.
The Baltics are at this point, already engaged in these forms of monstrosities. All that's left is a mass murder and/or slaughter of their Russian minority. At that point, the missiles will fly and the tanks will begin to roll in to level the place.
Unlike Ukraine (inspite of its turn to Nazi ideology) which is viewed by Russians as a "brotherly" nation; the Baltics are viewed (correctly so) as Nazis + Nazi collaborators (historically, and also at present given all the mercenary groups emanating from them).
Riga, Talinn and Vilnius will become smoking heaps of rubble filled with wails of misery and an "all against all" mentality on the ground. That future runs towards us in earnest!
Obvious: attack the commander's head directly.
If that fails, then run away and declare unconditional peace.
It is extremely difficult to kill Putin. Therefore, the war will peter out.
Just another winter of low-level angst and corruption in Europe, as any other winter.
The Retarded States of Europe would be a name to consider in the future decades.
If the soccer players all die in Qatar and never come back, then maybe Europe could be saved culturally. But there will only be war in the newspaapers and in the very damaged minds of the people addicted to FUD.
I have read that Putin might escalate it from a Special Military Operation(SMO,) to a Counterterrorism Operation(CTO). From what I have read, Putin is using specific terms short of war in accordance with established international law, including the UN Charter, as well as Russian law.
Unlike the US, Putin follows all the requirements of the law when he authorizes military action. This is very helpful with the rest of the world outside the American hegemony. This is a battle of state sovereignty vs. globalism. Putin, even when invading, is respecting state sovereignty principles.
I hadn't read that but it sounds plausible to me. I agree that the Russians (and Chinese) actively attempt to follow the letter of the law more than the US. The US tends to see itself as embodying "the spirit of the law" and thus being above the written words. The Russians deem us "incapable of agreement" as a result. (They have a specific Russian word or phrase which escapes me, I apologize.)
In any case, I think one could make the case that if the eastern provinces join the Russian Federation, and are then attacked, then Russia would be within its rights to wage war under the color of law. The US and EU would dispute it, of course, but they'll dispute a CTO as well.
Under the "rules based international order" aka American empire, America has broken international law repeatedly and justified it. The "rules" are just whatever America decides at any given time and can be contradictory. This is how a hegemon acts, so no surprise.
But America doesn't act under the "spirit of the law". All of Russia's friends know this and want to end the American order. America is actually really bad at being a hegemon, as we have too many greedy midwits in leadership.
America may not act under the "spirit of the law" by any objective criteria, but what I said was that it sees itself as embodying it. And I do think America *definitely* sees itself as embodying it. "We are the indispensable nation" is a direct quote from one of our Presidents. That self-perception is how we justify breaking the rules we claim to uphold. Ok, so, that said, do you actually disagree that is America's self-perception? If so, how do you think America sees itself? Or did you just want to clarify that America isn't what it thinks it is?
American leaders, like the British previously, view whatever they do as good and correct. America traditionally held itself above things like deal making and diplomacy. We could say this started with Wilson, but it was established previously, like with the Open Door policy or even the Monroe Doctrine.
As to breaking laws, that is what America always does. We are just self righteous tyrants that claim to be just abiding by rules but only to enforce them on others, never ourselves. Then we get blowback and wonder how it happened.
America is "indispensable" only because we forced the end of England's and France's empires after WW2 and created Pax Americana. And 30 years ago, instead of allowing the creation of a multipolar world after the end of the Cold War, our leaders decided to rule the world.
American people want to see themselves as selfless good guys. Many politicians want that as well. It isn't true and has not been true. This is the fundamental dilemma for America. Can we admit we act for self interest and to maintain our empire? Or do we keep lying to ourselves about our motives and goals? We push the moralizing about war as a way to justify ourselves.
Tl:dr; version: America leaders lie to it the people and moralize that we are doing something for "good", while breaking laws and rules. The way the FBI treated Trump over the last 6 years is how America treats the world.
I agree with this assessment. I actually had started writing an essay about the American dilemma of trying to maintain itself as "the indispensable nation" while at the same time acting in naked self-interest. But it was too bleak even for me. I might revisit it at some future point.
It was a discussion I had at length with my US foreign relations PhD advisor. I really appreciate some of the older critiques of American foreign policy from what we would term "leftists" at the time, but would struggle to fit into modern leftism.
The antiwar and anti empire idea existed on the Right until the death of Senator Taft in the 50s, only to come back with Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul (though for different reasons). The left had prominent antiwar and anti empire folks from WWI. I find myself in agreement with these people more than I would have thought. My old school far leftist advisor and I agreed on so much, including that Wilson was the devil.
We took up England's role as enforcers for the globalist speculative financial interests. We don't even do our own bidding. Everything else is smokescreen and illusion, to deceive good intentioned people.
I am reminded of this quote:
""We seem, as it were, to have conquered and peopled half the world in a fit of absence of mind.""
~John Robert Seeley
This mind you is the very same Seeley who played a pivotal role in the 1880s (and beyond) popularizing the "Imperial Federation" model (essentially a superstate comprising the Home Islands and the colonies) rather than pursuing Home Rule (which he correctly noted in his Historiographical works and sketches as ultimately leading to independence for said colonies and a fracturing of the Empire).
Relevant: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2142255.pdf
If anything, Yankee-land is just the "Imperial Federation... Downsized". At least... functionally it behaves in a manner precisely which would have made Seeley beam with joy.
What we have today is Yankee-land running amok as a rogue nation of pirates, thieves, rapists and murderers in that manner which Seeley observed... "in a fit of absence of mind".
And this is why, no such dilemma ultimately exists for the Yankee... because to get to a dilemma one must Ipso facto be *thinking* to begin with.
However, no such thing is happening here. Yankee land is engaged in an Autopoesis that is entirely sub-rational and in a way "beyond" thinking.
Relevant: "Autopoiesis" https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/autopoiesis
> What we have today is Yankee-land running amok as a rogue nation of pirates, thieves, rapists and murderers
Um, no. Compare America to just about any historical Empire, like say one of your beloved caliphates. Those were much more piratical, thieving, rapy, and murderous than America ever was.
provocative stuff. I will say that the proclamations that 90% of people in contested territories want to be part of Russia sounds frighteningly similar to Hitler's claims about ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland.
also re below; i think the idea that Putin follows the requirements of "the law" (whose? International? Russias?) is absolutely one of the most hysterical things I've ever read.
I recently discovered your Substack and this was an interesting post to read in April 2023. It seems that the surprisingly mild winter in Europe has allowed us to “dodge the bullet” so far on escalation.
Nice prediction, as of Feb. 2023 it basically matches what was predicted.
Listened to this podcast the other day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqeJA3o1qfI (sorry, it's in Russian.)
Andrei Illarionov - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Illarionov - used to be Putin's senior advisor from 2000 to 2005, but since then became his "critic" (aka enemy.) He is clearly pro-Ukraine in this conflict. However, he had always been very measured in his analysis, though.
He follows Onyx's analysis of the sides' losses. He claims that Onyx is independent and thorough. Here are the two links (the dates are Feb 24, but they are being updated on a regular basis):
https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html
https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-ukrainian.html
In that podcast he makes the following claim. According to their data up until August 21-25 the U to R loss ratio was averaging 1:3.5 or so, with the battle of Severodonetsk and Lysychansk being the highest (for U) ratio of 1:1.1 . His point is that Russia has an advantage in people (including the mobilization potential) and hardware of approximately 5:1, so in the war of attrition any loss ratio less than that is in Russia's favor.
From August 21-25 the ratio went up to 1:7, so now the war of attrition turned against R. That was part of the reason Putin raised the stakes with the mobilization, annexations, and nuclear threats. According to Illarionov Putin wants the US to blinken (sorry, could not resist) and force the U to talk.
Illarionov speculates that the change in loss ratio is connected to U's forces increase in proficiency. They mobilized early and then underwent multi-month training in Europe. Russian army is losing proficiency, on the other hand, due to heavy losses among the professional military.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Germany breaks before either Ukraine or Russia.
Some Commentators (such as Gonzalo Lira) have noted that the Nordstream pipelines being sabotaged (we all know by whom; let's not kids ourselves here) are the modern day equivalent of Cortez landing and then burning his ships: essentially signalling to his crew that "there is no turning back". The March to World War (and Yankee-land's Salting) thus draws ever closer.
In our modern day context, the Yankee is whipping his poodles, lackeys, etc in Europe to get ready for a full confrontation with the Russkies. Victoria Nuland did say "Fuck the EU!"; so it looks like she is adamant in following through with that quite *literally*.
The Germans will lose what manufacturing they have left and be among the first to be Bioengineered into Hybrid Chimeras to fight the "Eurasian Hordes" in the near future. Unfortunately for them (and their Yankee overlords) Europe will be overrun very quickly for a very simple reason:
The Qualitative Calibre (not just "escalatory dominance" but at the grand strategic level) of the Russkies has long surpassed both them and their Yankee overlords; who spent most of the money on defunct technologies (the F-35 program, anyone?)
Once the Eurasian Hordes land; the "rulers" will try to flee to their bunkers and mansions in New Zealand and elsewhere (if they have not already); all the while tapping into their final ace in the hole: "Dem White People dun nit!" The Culture Wars of today are just a massive insurance policy to stave off this genocidal outcome for the "ruling elite" of today:
If the Russian Bear, Chinese Dragon, etc start running after you; just push the nearby "HUWYTE people" into their clutches for mauling. Unfortunately for them; neither they (nor the masses they defiled, lampooned and demonized for the last 5+ decades) will be spared.
Anger, Grief and then Revenge... that Trifecta is a bedrock of the human condition. Once it is activated, it will not be satiated until you have a situation like (say) Baghdad overflowing with so much blood, guts, puss, etc that the Euphrates itself goes red-yellow for weeks on end.
For the near future context, the analogue would be the Mississipi going red for a few weeks from all the carnage; especially in the heavier more urban areas being made Yankee-free.
You have the most bizarre fantasies.
It's a done deal at this point. There is no stopping the street-by-street lynchings, massacres, etc. The only matter is timeframe wise how "fast" will the onset be?
Funny how each of your fantasies involves completely different events, but all end with your revenge by proxy fantasy.
Well, I'm sure A la the magnificent will make it work somehow.
If the self-proclaimed "indispensable nation" is an industrial numb-nut who produces 85 million metric tonnes of steel whilst the Eurasians get well over a billion... it is quite self-evident that this will be a slaughter, not a war.
Ergo, why in every situation the end result is the same: Carthago Delenda Est.
Well, so far it has been more of a stalemate.
There is no such thing as a "stalemate" in Industrial Warfare.
The Side that outproduces the other Side will Triumph inevitably. In the case of "World War Next", the side outproducing by a factor greater than 10 will Slaughter the other side. It's a Mathematical Certainty, nothing more or less.
Russia is NOT losing this war. The whole thing is staged by all parties to try to bring in the NWO. It should be obvious to everyone by now that all of the countries pretending to be fighting are working together
You're not the first person who has shared this view. Do you care to elaborate? E.g. what is the mechanism by which the war will bring about the NWO, etc?
I believe they will use tactical nukes to take out major cities in all large countries. That, together with their Geoengineered Weather Warfare destroying people, property and food crops, will cause people to panic and beg for help from the UN and the WEF and the WHO and their own governments. I wish people could see through this and rise up together to stop it.
If Nuclear weapons are used, none of these organizations will remain.
There seems be an assumption here that somehow (as the sky darkens from the soot and the vaporized remains and ashes of those people nearest the blast radii) that somehow anything of the "familiar world" we all know to some extent will survive.
The Internet will be completely gone due to EMP weapons destroying critical infrastructure. There will be no "plan" or order here. There can be no "order" or "plan" implemented if the very nature of the world becomes one of "fight or die".
There is no "plan" by the so called "elite class" (Davos-man if you will) that survives this. Schwaub and his ilk will be *lucky* if they are mercifully cannibalized without anesthesia by vagrants and wanderers who have not eaten for 28 days.
No "Elite Plan" will be implemented. Because people will devolve into savages engaged in necrophilia, cannibalism and other monstrosities.
Frankly, to even assume that such a "Plan" to"Save or Damn us all" ... is a sort of optimistic humanist fantasy that falls apart upon closer inspection.
I think you’re right. And they are beginning to realize just what you said here. If the people are unable to get justice their own AI will take them out because they are entitled whiny parasites who contribute nothing to society. THEY are the useless eaters.
Artificial General Intelligence is still quite far away. Thinkers like Bostrom (the author of "Superintelligence" and other related works) note for example that we seem to have reached a "bottleneck" with regard to Replicating Cognition (the standard frameworks taught in the Academia such as Neural Networks, Embodied Cognition, etc just are not getting the job done). In effect, we are (not his words, these are mine:) in an "Uncanny Valley" for the time being. So the "AI" issue is not of importance (at least for now)
If anything, Nuclear War and the fundamental change it would have on society (from the individual bottom up to the larger more cohesive structures such as family, relatives, friends, etc) is of greater concern. I try to explain it using the following analogy:
During the time of Hamilton (i.e. the American founders) to even accuse someone of lying meant being challenged to a life or death duel by said individual who wished to protect his sacred honour. No such notion remains in today's West.
Today, "Kill him" or "Fuck him up" is easily enunciated, threatened (and carried out) with little to no "blowback". Yes, the authorities may or may not intervene, but that too is fading rapidly as the public zeitgeist shifts.
A Nuclear Holocaust of 800 million to 2 billion souls would be a paradigm shift.
The world will be such that "EAT Him" (live, heart beating of course) or "Necrophilize that Sl*t" (already dead and half eaten of course) will become as normal (with regard to enunciation, threats and carrying out) as the aforementioned "Kill him" and "Fuck him up" are found to be today.
I understand that there are now treatments for nonsensical verbal diarrhea. Please ask your doctor about it and get the help that you need.
It will help your credibility if you learn the difference between a tactical and a strategic nuke. Hint: nukes that are designed to destroy entire cities are not tactical...
And, for what it's worth, there are those in the Christian church who will cite prophecy about what they may view as a "player" in revelation's prophecy. Here's what a Bing search says to the question:
Is Russia Rosh, Gog or Magog?
Gog is a person who rules over the land of Magog (Russia). Magog means the “Prince of Rosh.” (Gog) Rosh is the old root word for the land of Russia. God informs Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38:15 , “You will come from your place in the far North” (the Hebrew word means “the uttermost part of the North.” Hmmm...
I re-read Revelations the other day. There's a plausible case to be made that the First and Second Seals were opened in 2021 and 2022, and that the Third Seal opens this winter...
The invasion by Gog and Magog is to happen AFTER the Millenium. See Rev 20:7.
So, you're telling me that I can relax... that Putin won't plunge the world into a nuclear holocaust, but that we have to wait until Satan's loosed? "And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison," KJV
No. I'm telling you that the invasion predicted in Ezekiel will not happen until Jesus has reigned for a thousand years on earth along with those raised in the First Resurrection -- if Revelations is authoritative.
We can still have bad people do bad things without it fulfilling this particular prophesy. We have had Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Genghis Khan all without the world ending.
We do seem to be entering the Great Falling Away. And the state of Israel exists, which is prophetically significant. But Israel still has no Temple to desecrate in order to fulfill the Olivet Prophecy.
Also, Isaac Newton placed the date as being after 2060.
By then we might have the technology to have an asteroid mining accident/act of terrorism which would fulfill the Wormwood prophecy.